To preface, what follows may be seen as a small critique on: Personhood. But first, one needs to unavoidably concur that God: the One; the All; the Monad; the No-Thing of Potential, possesses distinction and self-awareness; this is arguably the very essence of Personhood. Now, with this differential, this Archetypical Person is undoubtedly set in distinction to its rarefied environment, but one still cannot identify this distinction as a good or a bad thing, as this thought experiment is far too close to the Source of Differentiation to have enough tangibility on hand for comparative use. This “Monadic-God-Person”, if you will, could be seen analogously to the state in physics called: Compression. Compression in its fundamental operation cannot necessarily be identified as either a good or a bad thing, it’s simply an unavoidable structure that inevitably affekts something else.
Within the triumph of the Sovereign, Indivisible (yet differentiated) God-Person, Mankind was born absolutely radiant in Kind. And yet, as we now look at today’s ever-morphing, schizophrenic notion of the subjectively independent person(a), we emphatically argue that this solely independent, utterly unique, self-subjected person(a)– one who literally personifies the current “manu-fractured” state of society– is a malicious distortion of the Indivisible Sovereignty that manifested, or differentiated, into the personifying Image (i.e., Mankind). As Mankind is (at the very least) a unified “cosmic organism” of indivisible uniqueness. Continue reading “Today’s Abstract Notion Of Personhood”