To preface, what follows may be seen as a small critique on: Personhood. But first, one needs to unavoidably concur that God: the One; the All; the Monad; the No-Thing of Potential, possesses distinction and self-awareness; this is arguably the very essence of Personhood. Now, with this distinction, this Archetypical Person is undoubtedly set in “opposition” to its rarefied environment, but one still cannot identify this “opposition” as a good or a bad thing, as this thought experiment is far too close to the Source of Differentiation to have enough tangible distinction on hand for comparative use. This “Monadic-God-Person”, if you will, could be seen analogously to the state in physics called: Compression. Compression in its fundamental operation cannot necessarily be identified as either a good or a bad thing, it’s simply its unavoidable structure that inevitably affekts something else.
Within the triumph of the Sovereign-Indivisible-God-Person Mankind was born absolutely radiant in Kind. And yet, as we now look at today’s ever-morphing notions of the subjectively independent person(a), we emphatically argue that this solely independent, utterly unique, self-subjected person(a)– one who literally personifies the “manu-fractured” state of society– is a malicious distortion of the Indivisible Sovereignty that manifests as the personifying Image (i.e., Mankind). As Mankind is (at the very least) a unified “cosmic organism” of indivisible uniqueness. Continue reading “The Opposition of Personhood”